|
|||||||
| Arrowhead Hunting & Collecting New to hunting & collecting? An old pro looking for new tricks? Get and give answers here! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hey Guys/Gals,
This is what I would guess is either a flake core or core/hammer combo. The pictures are set up (1-6) to easily refer to a picture and a zone within that picture (a,b,c,d). I have my guesses where certain flakes have been taken out as well as certain areas that show battering. I would ask the community to help identify: 1) Impact type corresponding to a picture/zone. 2) What they were trying to accomplish that created the impact type. I figure this might be a good resource for future members and will help clear up a few things for me as well! Cortex/Bottom ![]() Dorsal ![]() Ventral ![]() Edge 1 ![]() Edge 2 ![]() Top ![]() Thanks in advance all...
__________________
"A tool is a physical object that is manipulated by the user to affect change in some aspect of the environment. Basically, a tool is defined by use and not by morphology. Therefore, a flake is a tool if used as a tool." ~ Christopher Baber, Cognition and Tool Use. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am thinking 1 C/D signs of battering and 3 B flake removal with early termination. 1 A bulb of force. Am I correct so far?
__________________
"A tool is a physical object that is manipulated by the user to affect change in some aspect of the environment. Basically, a tool is defined by use and not by morphology. Therefore, a flake is a tool if used as a tool." ~ Christopher Baber, Cognition and Tool Use. Last edited by Mud Hawk; 04-29-2011 at 09:09 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Really good pictures, Mud -- better than mine are. But I'm having too much trouble "visualising" it in the round to comment.
What I do see is that it's a piece of tabular chert that's been subjected to a lot of battering (gazillions of step fractures). All other things being equal (and they never are), they would indicate use as a splitting wedge (piece esquilles). If so, both a thinner edge (or edges) and the opposite side (s) would show this unless there were a right-angle opposite edge that was pounded with something like a wooden maul. Ain't much,but it's all I got
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Uniface, you gave me more to ponder... I never thought about the possibility of being struck with a softer material. This was by no means a sly "ID" post. I know it has been utilized by Archaic Natives (95% of identifiable/commonly accepted finds are mid to late Archaic).
I will post a youtube video in the next two days for a clear idea of its 3D form. I truely want to learn more about reading impacts in lithic study.
__________________
"A tool is a physical object that is manipulated by the user to affect change in some aspect of the environment. Basically, a tool is defined by use and not by morphology. Therefore, a flake is a tool if used as a tool." ~ Christopher Baber, Cognition and Tool Use. Last edited by Mud Hawk; 04-29-2011 at 10:00 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm figuring it's obvious that it's on the small side to have been a hammerstone.
Then again, in that era, it could possibly have been a strike-a-light. Broadpoint people made some nice ones. They look like hafted scrapers on broken points but the working edge is blunt and stepped like that from hitting it with a chunk of pyrite to produce sparks. Or at least that's the sense people have traditionally made of them. Once you get past boring old points ![]() ![]() there aren't too many "canned answers."
Last edited by uniface; 05-01-2011 at 03:50 PM. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
© 2009 Arrowheadology.com. All Rights Reserved. info AT arrowheadology.com.