Go Back   Arrowheads and Indian Artifacts | Arrowheadology.com Forums > Arrowheadology > In The News

In The News Stop the presses! Here are the latest artifact related discoveries, updates and reports hot off the wire!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-20-2012, 05:51 AM
Otepgod's Avatar
Arrowheadologist


 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Beloit, WI
Posts: 248
Museum gives back artifacts

Sorry if this has already been posted, but I found the article interesting.

Kingman Museum gives back artifacts to Native Americans | The Enquirer | battlecreekenquirer.com
__________________
http://www.zazzle.com/relicshack


Otepgod
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-20-2012, 08:47 AM
Palmwood's Avatar
Elite Arrowheadologist


 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,390
I am a direct descendant of the Clovis people. So I guess I better get busy collecting all of my spear tips and tools from the museums.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-20-2012, 09:24 AM
joshuaream's Avatar
Moderator


 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Weston, FL
Posts: 2,137
That article is kind of interesting, I can see return remains if they can trace the origin clearly. e.g. The Smithsonian used to have remains of some known people from the Plains tribes, either recovered from a battlefield or people who died and were buried at a fort or post. If my great-great grandfather died and his remains were taken and stuffed in a basement somewhere where no one was ever going to see them or study them, I guess I'd prefer that he be buried in the family plot.

What gets interesting in the Tlingit mummified head mentioned in the article, is that most Tlingit heads were of made from people from other groups. So would you return said head to the Tlingit, or the group of the person the Tlingit killed to get the head? Some groups who had a historical hatred of each other have brought this up before, the insult of burying someone from that group on their land or having their loved ones buried by the other group.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-20-2012, 10:29 AM
Indianasmith's Avatar
Moderator


 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,197
I've always said that human remains should not be returned unless ancestry can be proven!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-20-2012, 11:05 AM
Graduate Arrowheadologist
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: valdosta ga.
Posts: 754
When they extracted DNA from remains at Windover archaic cemetary in Florida it was consistent with European DNA(5 samples from different individuals).All of a sudden the DNA testing was suspended, i wonder why? This is the largest archaic cemetary in the USA. Does this mean those remains should be returned to Europe?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-21-2012, 05:33 AM
Mud Hawk's Avatar
Tribal Council Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Keystone State
Posts: 2,800
Joshua brings up a great point with the Tlingit head. I would hope the returns are substantiated by DNA testing. Otherwise (outside of Paleo/Early Archaic) snap a few pics, keep a DNA sample, and get them back in the ground of their people.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-27-2012, 10:31 AM
RED ANT's Avatar
Mysophobic
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sacramento Ca. Maidu territory
Posts: 79
Its like digging up your great grandparent. Put the body back in the ground where it belongs.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0