Go Back   Arrowheads and Indian Artifacts | Arrowheadology.com Forums > Arrowheadology > Primitive Technology & Cultures

Primitive Technology & Cultures All things related to ancient technology (knapping, archery and replications) & cultures (pre-Columbian, old-world, stone-age)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-13-2011, 08:08 AM
Arrowheadologist
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Farmers Branch TX
Posts: 182
Tiny Bird Points

There have been many discussions about the use of the tiny little bird points we find. In the post about Ha-won-je-tah there is a video of paintings made back in the 1800's of indian life as the artist saw it. Painting 15 or 16 is of a very young boy with a very small bow and very small arrows. It looks like there are some points on those arrows. I think that this answers the question of what these tiny points were used for. Little boys going after small game needed small points. I always believed this and now I am certain that this is the answer.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-13-2011, 08:52 AM
Wildhorse's Avatar
Senior Arrowheadologist


 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Washington State
Posts: 323
Pit House

Years ago we found and dug a pit house that was located at the mouth of a creek on the Yakima river. Every point that came out of that house was under 1" and most under 1/2". What we call Bird points. There was a large swampy area right by this house and it still is a area full of Ducks and birds. Seems to me thay hunted all the birds and that was why there were only these small points and no big game points. Only a guess but that is what we found.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-13-2011, 10:11 AM
joshuaream's Avatar
Moderator


 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Weston, FL
Posts: 2,137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Ellis View Post
Little boys going after small game needed small points.
Little boys might need littler bows, but the arrowhead wouldn't need to change much. To me the questions become Can small points only be used for killing small game? and Did people use specifically use bigger points to kill bigger game?

The answer to both questions is No. Small points are very effective at killing big animals, and there is no evidence of any ancient group choosing 5" points on spears to kill big animals while at the same time choosing small points to kill small animals.

I think the average Folsom point might be 1.5 inches to 2 inches or so in lenth, but many of them are less than an inch and they effectively killed animals north of 2,500 pounds. At many bison jumps on the upper plains regions, "bird points" are the only points found. Again, tiny points used in dispatching large animals. The Was-hita points from Oklahoma, Kansas, etc. are absolutely tiny and light weight, yet they killed everything from Bison to Spanish Conquistadors. The extreme example of this are some of the Aleut points from Alaska and Canada. A small tipped point being used in a system to kill a 15,000 pound animal.

I firmly believe that children actively participated in food gathering and having a group of 6-10 year olds hunting birds, rabbits, squirrels, ground hogs, raccoons, fish, turtles, gathering duck eggs, etc. would have contributed a lot of protein while the men sat around talking about how big of a bison they were going to kill next time.

I have attached two pictures. One is of some quartz blow gun dart tips. There are three on each dime, and weigh next to nothing. They would have been used with poison, and could kill a large animal given enough time. They might have darted them and then tracked the animal for a day or two before it died.

Name:  points.jpg
Views: 470
Size:  15.9 KB


The second is a picture of a traditional Eskimo whale hunt (well, relatively traditional, no rifles and exploding harpoons.) One of the harpoons is laying on the ice. They would have used a couple harpoons and the whale might have taken several hours to die, which isn't cool in modern hunting culture, but it was still effective.

Name:  whale_hunt_tail.jpg
Views: 531
Size:  46.7 KB

Joshua

Last edited by joshuaream; 05-13-2011 at 10:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-13-2011, 10:19 AM
joyce's Avatar
Relic hunter


 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Northwest Illinois
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Ellis View Post
There have been many discussions about the use of the tiny little bird points we find. In the post about Ha-won-je-tah there is a video of paintings made back in the 1800's of indian life as the artist saw it. Painting 15 or 16 is of a very young boy with a very small bow and very small arrows. It looks like there are some points on those arrows. I think that this answers the question of what these tiny points were used for. Little boys going after small game needed small points. I always believed this and now I am certain that this is the answer.
Very good that you noticed the child in Catlins painting with his little bow & arrows. Like you I have always believed the same, and that painting is proof! Joyce
__________________
Don't let yesterday use up to much of tomorrow!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-13-2011, 10:34 AM
Gibby's Avatar
Graduate Arrowheadologist
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hocking Hills, OH
Posts: 881
I think the size of the arrowhead doesn't really matter. It was only needed to break the skin and the shaft and the bleeding was what done them in. Some folsom points are perfect examples. They were killing some large game and most of the Folsom's are not really that big. I think they just needed something to penetrate the skin.
__________________
When I'm a good dog they sometimes throw me a bone.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-13-2011, 11:36 AM
kentlangreder's Avatar
Moderator


 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Moniteau county, Missouri
Posts: 2,412
as a bow hunter i see that a small profectile does a lot of damage as a big game animal runs it twists and tears up a lot of tissue. leading to the animal expiring from loss of blood.

kent
__________________
who is wise? he who learns from every person
www.arrowheadology.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-13-2011, 11:58 AM
knife river's Avatar
Graduate Arrowheadologist


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SE Georgia
Posts: 640
Excellent post, Joshua. With our modern weapons and contemporary values, we feel a need to kill in a certain way -- usually as quickly as possible by heavy shock and massive bleeding. I think it's useful to keep in mind that our values, techniques, and weapons are dramatically different from old cultures. One early ethnographer (Catlin?) mentioned that buffalo were shot in the liver (it will kill the animal and avoids the wall of ribs). There are films of African tribesmen killing giraffes and elephants by spearing them in the bladder and liver. Although it takes longer for the animal to die, it may have been considered a more successful strategy. Other strategies include severing the femoral artery in the hindquarters and puncturing the diaphragm (loss of air pressure = collapsed lungs).

On an aside, have you guys noted the similarities in mammoth/mastodon kill sites? Specifically, where points and bone rods are concentrated? Very interesting. I think the evidence for how Clovis guys hunted elephants has been there all along...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-13-2011, 08:51 PM
longtimefree's Avatar
Elite Arrowheadologist
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: san diego ca.
Posts: 1,506
tiny bird points

i never knew what to think about these bird points, they just seemed to be to small to be of any use in my mind, but i see them broken like they have been used and thanks to your article i now have a better understanding of what they may of been used for,
Attached Images
 
__________________
we have done so much, with so little, for so long, that now we can do anything, with nothing
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-14-2011, 04:43 AM
Chad Gilbert's Avatar
Senior Arrowheadologist


 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denton County,Texas
Posts: 448
I'm of the opinion that arrow points (bird points) were used with bows. The bow developed around 700 AD. I don't think the larger dart points could be shot by a bow and retain any accuracy or range.
Name:  5 points 2011.jpg
Views: 431
Size:  16.2 KB
It doesn't seem likely that only points made pre 700 AD were used for hunting larger game. Nor that arrow points made post 700 AD were only used by children.
Name:  Huffaker, Steiner,Lott, Morris.jpg
Views: 509
Size:  29.3 KB

I do however, believe pre 700 AD dart points and post 700 AD arrow points were both used for a time. Darts with spears or lances and arrows with bows.

Just my thoughts.
Chad
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-31-2011, 08:08 AM
eddies's Avatar
PhD in Arrowheadology


 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: cleveland ohio
Posts: 2,798
I love those little bird points,hope to find one some day
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0