|
|||||||
| Primitive Technology & Cultures All things related to ancient technology (knapping, archery and replications) & cultures (pre-Columbian, old-world, stone-age) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
A Little Intro to Mousterian Stuff
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a good read, thanks for posting the link.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nice article about European artifacts.
__________________
Not all who wander are lost. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Compare this artifact to the third from left in the first row. Let me clarify this, i am not saying that Neanderthals were here, however, based on tools and cores i have personally found, i do believe someone was making Levallois tools here at some point in time, and since they are not described in Clovis or later cultures in the hundreds of thousands of professional archeological excavations done in the East, well..... Scalpel indicates bulb of percussion.
Last edited by rokdok; 10-15-2010 at 01:17 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks UNI///c
__________________
The soul of wit may become the very body of untruth.However elegant and memorable,brevity can never,in the nature of things, do justice to all the facts of a complex situation. ![]() ~~Aldous Huxley |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
At the heart of this is the 180-degree difference in approach between the Mousterian and subsequent knapping strategies.
The result is that when people familiar with the later approach, and thinking in terms of it, look at artifacts produced by the older technology, not seeing what they're looking for, they dismiss them as waste flakes, frost splits and such -- non artifacts. The article on re-creating a Scottsbluff point on the home page(s) here is a good example of the later approach : starting with a big piece of chert and removing hundreds of flakes from it until what results is a Scottsbluff point and a lot of "waste flakes." This approach to making a point, a tool &c. is what people assume must have been the case earlier, but wasn't. Jacques Bordaz, Tools of the Old and New Stone Age (American Museum of Natural History/Dover Books, 1959). p. 39 : ". . . [i]nstead of trying to get one, or at best two or three flakes of maximum length, the Mousterian knappers concentrated on getting the maximum number of usable flakes." Flakes were what they set out to produce. This might be an inside-out way of looking at it, but it's the one that corresponds with the record. FWIW |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just curious Uni, have you ever done any knapping or been to a "quarry" site? I have been to several quarry sites where debitage is scattered on the ground for miles around them
__________________
Not all who wander are lost. Last edited by DesertWalker; 10-19-2010 at 09:33 AM. Reason: sp |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi DW
Yes and yes. The scatter didn't extend for miles though. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Don't mean to argue but I've been in sites that extended many miles. Tens of miles in some cases...
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Fine with me.
Quarry sites I've been familiar with weren't that extensive. Then again, there are trails in Penna. from South Mountain going in several directions that are paved with rhyolite flakes, so they tell me. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
© 2009 Arrowheadology.com. All Rights Reserved. info AT arrowheadology.com.